Skip to content
View commentaries on this research

Please note that this summary was posted more than 5 years ago. More recent research findings may have been published.

This is a plain English summary of an original research article. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and reviewer(s) at the time of publication.

The diabetes drug metformin may help women with polycystic ovarian syndrome who are having problems getting pregnant, but it is unclear whether it works better than an alternative fertility drug that stimulates the ovaries.

This study updates a previous review of trials that compare metformin with placebo, no treatment or with the fertility drug clomifene. It summarised results of 48 studies, including 4,451 women. The study found that metformin may work better than placebo or no treatment and helps about six in every hundred women with the condition to achieve a successful pregnancy. But there was insufficient evidence to say whether it worked better than clomifene, or whether the combination worked better than clomifene alone.

The findings reflect the current state of knowledge about treatment of this condition and are aligned with current practice and guidance.

Why was this study needed?

Polycystic ovarian syndrome is a hormonal disorder which affects between 5 and 15% of women of reproductive age. Ovulation is often suppressed, making it harder for women to get pregnant. Women with polycystic ovaries are often overweight or obese and may have insulin resistance or type 2 diabetes.

Weight loss is often suggested as first-line treatment where required, followed by clomifene, a drug that stimulates ovulation, or metformin, a drug that addresses insulin resistance, helps weight loss and can help control type 2 diabetes. However, it is unclear which treatment is better for helping women to have a successful pregnancy. This study updates a previous review of the evidence, adding four new trials and re-analysing the data.

What did this study do?

This was a systematic review and meta-analysis. Researchers assessed trials comparing insulin-sensitising drugs with no treatment, placebo or the ovulation-stimulating drug clomifene, for women with polycystic ovaries and fertility problems.

The researchers searched the literature and found 48 relevant trials (including 4,451 women), all of which looked at the insulin-sensitising drugs including metformin. The review was an update of a review published in 2012 and identified four new trials.

Researchers presented data about live birth rate and gastro-intestinal side effects. They also included information about pregnancies, miscarriages and ovulation rates, and compared results in women who were obese (BMI of 30 or over) or not obese.

They assessed risk of bias in the individual studies and found that this ranged from very low to moderate.

What did it find?

  • Women were more likely to have a live birth if they took metformin, compared to no treatment, or placebo. Low-quality evidence from four studies (435 women) showed a birth rate of 208 per 1,000 women with metformin (95% confidence interval [CI] 141 to 292) compared to 141 per 1,000 for women taking placebo or no treatment. That suggests a 59% increased chance of live birth for women taking metformin (odds ratio [OR] 1.59, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.51), although the results are only marginally statistically significant.
  • Women taking metformin were more likely to get gastrointestinal side effects (OR 4.76, 95% CI 3.06 to 7.41), based on moderate quality evidence from seven studies (435 women). There was no difference in rates of miscarriage; however (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.50 to 2.35) based on low-quality evidence from four studies (748 women).
  • It was unclear whether adding metformin to clomifene helped more women to have live births (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.59), based on low-quality evidence from nine studies (1,079 women).
  • It was unclear whether metformin alone or clomifene alone helped more women to have live births. The results varied depending on the women’s BMI. Women with a BMI of under 30 were more likely to give birth if they had taken metformin (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.94, based on three studies with 241 women) while women with a BMI of over 30 were more likely to give birth if they had taken clomifene (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.52 based on two studies with 500 women). However, evidence for both groups was judged of very low quality.

What does current guidance say on this issue?

The NICE guideline on fertility problems published in 2013 recommends: “Offer women with WHO Group II anovulatory infertility (which includes polycystic ovarian syndrome) one of the following treatments, taking into account potential adverse effects, ease and mode of use, the woman's BMI, and monitoring needed: clomifene or metformin or a combination of the above.”

The guideline says women taking metformin should be informed about potential gastrointestinal side effects, and that women with polycystic ovarian syndrome who are obese should be advised that losing weight may restore ovulation.

What are the implications?

The study reaffirms the current state of knowledge in treatment of polycystic ovarian syndrome. The updated summary of evidence does not suggest a need to change practice.

The relatively high levels of gastrointestinal side effects found in the studies are a reminder that women should be advised of this risk when considering treatment. The differential findings regarding success of metformin and clomifene for women of different weights reinforces the suggestion in NICE guidelines that clinicians consider a woman’s weight before recommending treatment.

Citation and Funding

Morley LC, Tang T, Yasmin E, et al. Insulin-sensitising drugs (metformin, rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, D-chiro-inositol) for women with polycystic ovary syndrome, oligo amenorrhoea and subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;11:CD003053.

No external funding was received.

 

Bibliography

NICE. Fertility problems: assessment and treatment. CG156. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2013.

Produced by the University of Southampton and Bazian on behalf of NIHR through the NIHR Dissemination Centre

 


  • Share via:
  • Print article
Back to top